Uncategorized

  • analysis paralysis

    he said that it was my fatal flaw and what scared him the most about
    being around me- that i fall for and latch onto people or ideas much
    too quickly which inevitably is followed by me falling out of whatever
    it is that i fell so quickly into. love, lust, a crush, an obsession or what
    have you- just as suddenly as it happens or if not quicker, i lose
    interest. and the way he saw it, it's almost as if there's some kind of
    on/off switch within me, where with little rhyme or reason, i simply
    turn the switch off for folks or things, move on and away, sans any
    consideration for what i've left in the wake. i toss things to the
    wayside and then find a new interest. call it impulsive decision making
    or me being rash- whatever it is, it scared him.


    like moving to DC? the final shove towards the decision to
    move happened during a morning phone chat with my sister in which i was
    complaining about work and she simply asked, why not quit and move to
    DC. we talked about the logistics for a few moments, and then before i
    knew it, i was throwing my hands up and saying that i was going to do
    it. we then hung up the phone so she could tend to some work while i
    said that i would think it over a bit more and figure out some of the
    details. and over the course of the next 90 minutes i checked on my
    finances to make sure i could make the move, typed up a resignation
    letter and then sent an email out to everyone in my address book saying
    that i'd be quitting my job and moving to DC.
    emails began flying about why the sudden decision, and what was going on with me that i would decide to up and move... some thought that i was just having a knee-jerk reaction and needed to think it through.

    okay, so deciding in 90 minutes... that's the short version of the story because it
    didn't happen all that impulsively or rashly. i had been talking about
    moving for a good four months or so prior and had even interviewed for
    jobs in DC during that time. but cold feet and a weak heart got the
    better of me and kept me in Seattle for a bit longer. i talked myself
    out of moving for three or four months thinking that there was some
    kind of compelling reason to stay there. but that particular morning,
    as i was talking with my sister and finally made the decision to do it?
    i was just tired of deliberating the move and being stuck in analysis
    paralysis. if it was the wrong decision, it would become apparent very
    quickly, i thought, and then i could backtrack and do damage control if
    needed. so, i snapped my fingers and said that i would do it.


    so on the surface, sure, the decision seemed rash, or random
    even to some people. it easily came off as impulsive, or spontaneous.
    but in actuality, it was an idea that i had been toying with for months
    and had been considering the merits of incessantly. i just sat on
    making a concrete decision and let it fester for a while. and so when
    whatever was going on at work that morning that caused me to complain
    to my sister about things? it was just like the straw that finally
    broke the camel's back. something inconsequential happened or was said
    to finally help me choose between two options that i had been stuck
    between for months... i guess it was like i snapped, or snapped out of
    the analysis paralysis i was in.


    and this is indeed a pattern for me. when i might see that a
    change of course is necessary or a decision is to be made, i may look
    at the options and map out the possibilities but then true to form, i
    get torn between the choices and deciding which is the best route to
    take. i get stuck weighing the merits of the various possibilities...
    and then comes the indecision. i waffle. or, i sit around hoping that
    with more time, the right answer will surface or something will happen
    that makes the decision on my behalf. and if i wait around long enough,
    something usually does happen that will spur me into motion. something
    "snaps," or maybe i snap, and move in whatever direction i'm being pushed towards... and then comes the
    appearance i'm being impulsive when in reality i probably had been thinking
    about doing one thing or another for a while.

    the truth is, in most situations, where people are surprised by my actions or decisions, it's only because i've have failed to, or maybe purposely neglected to, communicate that i'm pondering doing something different or needing to explore alternatives. you may be surprised that i've decided to take on something new, but i more than likely was thinking for quite some time about it all. i was just stuck in that in-between place of not being quite so sure of what to do- analysis paralysis. and it's
    a miserable place to be for sure... being frozen by the fear of choosing the wrong thing.

    at some point, i know that i've got to stop thinking situations and
    scenarios out to no end. i need to stop playing out all the
    possibilities and alternative endings. i should stop reading between
    the lines where the in-between space might not even exist. and i have
    to give up analyzing every nuance to death. instead, i need to work at
    letting things be organic, letting things happen the way they will and
    then accepting them for what they are. and if i have to weigh the pros
    and cons, i've got to do it more quickly and then be decisive. it's a shift in thinking, and ultimately, that makes it
    another choice that i'll have to make and then run with. i just have to
    stop thinking about it so much and decide to go with it... if that's
    possible.

  • speed dating II.

    haha, i don't usually watch 106 & Park on BET, but for some reason, i was passing through just now and there was a Lloyd video featuring Lil Wayne, for the song You... and it features them at a speed-dating event... hilarious. i barely know who Lloyd and Lil Wayne are, but i suspect that i would never run into characters like those at a DC speed dating event... although, the guy who asked me if i make good money kinda does look like Lloyd. haha. check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqTGv8uDpU

  • french toast and writers block.

    before the snow had come, i recalled that my boss and co-workers had
    said that when the weather takes a turn for the worse, everyone in DC
    runs to the grocery store and buys up the following: eggs, milk, bread,
    and toilet paper. so as it started to snow yesterday, i remembered what
    they had said and thought i'd follow suit and make a grocery store run
    myself. i was fine on the toilet paper front, but i figured if everyone
    else was snatching up eggs, milk and bread, i should do the same and
    get my share of those items as well. true to form, the shelves at my
    local whole foods were unusually light on the eggs, milk and bread. i
    was able to pick up enough of those staples for my single self however
    and toted the groceries home along with some OJ and cheese. why eggs,
    milk and bread? who knows. but i ended up making some delicious french
    toast yesterday evening.



    let's call this writer's block, yes? french toast? i know. it's just
    that i have nothing compelling to say or write... or perhaps life just
    isn't that tough (thankfully). this is one reason to not blog, for
    sure. i feel self-induced pressure.

  • snow.

    it's finally snowing in DC. it's a light flurry falling, barely sticking... but it's too cold for me to be out and about in it. check it out:






        
    IMG_0743

    IMG_0755

     

  • a handshake.

    the nonverbal, our body language, accounts for 80% of communication. so when i shake your hand goodbye, you should get a clue that i'm just not that interested in you. otherwise, i would have given you a hug, a kiss on the cheek, or tried to prolong our outting. stop trying to ask me out for drinks or buy me dinner; i shook your hand. no thanks.

  • it's not personal

    i've come to believe that it's a rarity for people to do things that intentionally hurt others. "it's not personal. it never is..." i tell myself and
    others this all the time as it's a convenient and comforting notion that
    can be applied in such a variety of situations. i'm optimistic about the fact that at the core, we are all good people and intentional cruelty and maliciousness is only the result of mental disorder or being under the influence of drugs, alcohol, peer pressure, you fill in the blank. even then, it's still not personal; the behavior which has caused hurt is just a reflection of the perpetrator's self hatred, if you will.


    this rationale has been convenient particularly in situations
    where someone else has told me that things aren't working out, or that they just wanted to be friends.
    i've told myself that the person must have some things they are going
    through, or that they have issues for themselves they have to sort
    out... it's not personal. it has nothing to do with me. how could it?
    i'm a great person. i'm wonderful! it can't possibly have anything
    to do with me. it isn't personal.
    it can't be.


    but when i think back to times i've said to others
    that it isn't working out? when it's me who is saying that i am done,
    or that things aren't working out? i'm so quick to blame the other
    person for it not working. i can pinpoint their flaws, the problems or
    issues they have, which of course have absolutely nothing to do with
    me.
    i've never once self reflected and considered what part i played in
    things not working out. i mean, i may have delivered the line of, "it's
    me, it's not you..." but i'm not sure i really ever meant it genuinely.
    so what's the truth and where does reality lie?


  • dc style.

    i love being in DC. okay, so today in particular, i'm a little wiped.
    the week thus far has kicked my ass and as i type, it's past 6pm and
    i'm still at the office. do not pity me though. i roll in around or
    past 9am these days, and plus, since it's Thursday, that means i do have
    a beer on my right and a slice of pizza to my left, provided by the
    company mind you. every thursday. there are perks to being back in the private sector
    for sure.


    i do love the city and being here though. one DC negative
    however? the lack of style from a wardrobing perspective. if i can be
    made to feel uber chic and stylish, then that's gotta be saying
    something about this city. i mean i like to think that i have some
    modern and trendy influences and tastes, but i'm not at the cutting
    edge of fashion by any means. and i want people who are fashionable and uber chic to influence and encourage me to step
    up my fashion game. that ain't happening here though.


    even
    when interviewing for jobs, at the advice of my sister, i had to tone
    down the style factor and become a little more plain and conservative.
    no bulky jewelry, in fact, minimal jewelry. plain-jane hair. minimal makeup. the most
    conservative suits possible with plain collared shirts underneath;
    certainly no "chestica" shirts. (an inside joke... but after wearing a
    shirt bearing cleavage one evening, i was named "chestica"... a quite
    clever play on my name and words. i love it. hell, if you've got it,
    then flaunt it. yes?) for them to take me seriously, and for them to see how i might fit in with them, much to my chagrin, i followed her advice and dressed it down.


    DC has long had a bad rap when it comes to style... but
    perhaps things on the fashion front are getting better in DC. when
    condi blew into town, there was a lot of commentary on her style. and
    with madame pelosi at the helm now, DC style has become under even
    greater scrutiny, for the positive. check out this article for example:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/fashion/18pelosi.html?em&ex=1169269200&en=9d01e503d1dd9672&ei=5070 .

    one sure sign that this city still needs fashion help
    though? the plethora of gals carrying out quilt bags. they are hideous.
    i gag everytime i see a gal carrying one around and struggle with even imagining where you buy them. i'm not
    saying all gals need to be toting fendi and prada bags- even those things are too fancy for
    my taste- but the quilted handbags have got to go. chanel quilted
    purses are one thing, but to be carrying around this:




    please stop. really. please. i see so many DC gals (mostly white, sorry ladies, but it is the one common factor i've been able to pinpoint) carrying these hideous bags in a plethora of sizes and color and patterns. they just aren't cute and we can all do so much better. let's not give DC an even worse rap when it comes to style. please stop!

  • dating hell.

    so he said to me, "you make good money?"

    i was shocked, but started laughing out of complete disbelief. "seriously?" i asked him.

    "well, you look so well put together. nice scarf, fancy purse. do you?"

    "sure, i guess. do you make good money?"

    "yeah, enough to support me and my son. you have a problem with kids?"

    this was the highlight of my speed-dating adventure. my co-worker and i decided to be brave and check out the scene. 22 guys, four minutes apiece... and in the span of four minutes, most guys managed to ask the same questions over and over:

    what do you do?

    where do you live?

    how long have you been in DC?

    where are you from originally?  (oh, i hear it's nice out there. did it rain all the time?)

    what do you do for fun?

    i was tired of talking when guy #5 came around... and i think the only highlight was the fella who asked about my comp package and interest in kids. sure i like kids, but i probably won't like his is what i should have said. i guess if anything, he gets points for originality since he stands out more than anyone and certainly made an impression on me. but would i date anyone from that group? i could see hanging out with maybe the one guy who my co-worker is convinced is gay. perhaps i can be his hag; that could be fun. was it good entertainment though? of course. i'd do it again just for the sheer kicks and giggles.

  • four eyes.

    i have four eyes now! it's amazing how much clearer and crisper things are with glasses as it gets later in the day and my eyes get tired... but anyhow, my first pair of eye glasses! (slightly off topic, but is my nose really that big?)

  • fit and feel

    the conversation was about fit and feel.
    i haven't flushed this matter out entirely in my head... it's still kinda lingering around... but it's been on my mind and so here are some preliminary ramblings.

    in the ideal world, your (soul?) mate would both be a good "fit" for
    your life and lifestyle, and they would "feel" good too- the
    relationship would embody and capture both. we agreed that it's quite
    easy to meet people who fit in well, but don't feel that great; or meet
    people who feel really great, but don't fit well with where we are in
    our lives, or the lifestyle we want/aren't yet ready to give up... so
    we do what's best in those situations and move on, choosing to be on
    our own or trying once again to find someone who can do both for us-
    fit well and feel great... call it the pursuit of happiness, if you
    will.

    following this conversation though, the question that
    remained in my mind was how hard, if at all, should you try to make
    things fit and feel good? like if someone feels really great but
    fitting them in is difficult, how much effort should you put into
    making things work? now trying to facilitate or encourage a great feeling
    is probably impossible... but, changing things in your life, or making
    adjustments for the sake of fit? if you're willing to make changes in
    order to get the fit factor, then why not? i mean if you like a person, why
    not try a little?

    it's a
    conversation i've had before with exes too. how much should you try to
    make things work? and is it even necessary to try? or should "the one,"
    and the relationship with him or her, be so seamless and effortless
    that trying isn't necessary? do things really come that naturally?
    there are some who seem to think so, but i'm not one of them. i'm just
    not sure i'm naive enough to believe that it's really all that easy.

    the counter-argument for trying, or putting effort in, is
    that if you have to try, if you do try, you could conceivably make
    things work with just about anyone and therefore, have a relationship
    with any joe-schmoe- and there's very little that's meaningful about
    that. secondly, if you have to try, or have put some effort into making
    things work, the argument i've also heard is that the relationship must
    not be "the one." (that is, if you believe in there being, "the one.")

    to address their argument... it's
    a hard lesson that unfortunately, i've had to learn, but i so firmly
    believe it now: with any relationship- whether it's romantic, platonic,
    business or family- for it to be successful and meaningful, it's gonna
    take some effort. you have to make time for the person. you have to not
    only be conscious of your communication but also ensure that you
    continually and regularly communicate. you have to listen- really
    listen to them- and then take what you've heard and somehow integrate
    it into your actions or reactions. and finally, you've got to
    compromise. doing all of these things, to me, is trying, or putting in
    effort. and my natural inclination would be to do all those things
    because i like the person, or i care for them, or we have similar end
    goals in mind... but the truth of the matter is, when you get caught up
    in your daily life, sometimes it gets difficult to keep up and
    cultivate or maintain the relationship, and therefore, you have to
    start making conscious efforts.

    sure, it makes no sense to try, or put effort into
    something or someone and be working towards absolutely nothing. but i
    still don't see what's so wrong with effort and trying when you know
    that you're working towards something specific. maybe that's the factor
    to consider in deciding whether to try or not. you shouldn't try with
    just anyone or everyone; but when the cards are all lining up in the
    right direction, and the other person "feels" great, but the fit is a
    little iffy... why not? if something has the possibility of being worth it, or because that someone seems like they could be worth it, then maybe it could turn out to be something that's truly special. i mean it might not always work out in
    the end, and you might get tired of trying and putting effort into
    it... and there does come a point in time where you cut losses... but at the end of the day, at least you can say you tried. and
    all good things truly do take some work. wouldn't you say?

    i might be over thinking this one.